<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Northland Digital Agency &#187; YouTube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.northland.com.au/tag/youtube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.northland.com.au</link>
	<description>Digital Agency &#124; Internet Business Consultants, Web Design, SEO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 04:13:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why Aren&#8217;t There More YouTubes?</title>
		<link>http://www.northland.com.au/digital-strategy/why-arent-there-more-youtubes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.northland.com.au/digital-strategy/why-arent-there-more-youtubes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Northland Digital</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northland.com.au/?p=121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Web start-up guru Paul Graham recently talked about Why There Aren&#8217;t More Googles. The basic gist of it is that venture capitalists tend to be too conservative, investing in businesses that are based on already established revenue models. Nobody wants &#8230; <a href="http://www.northland.com.au/digital-strategy/why-arent-there-more-youtubes/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Web start-up guru Paul Graham recently talked about <a href="http://www.paulgraham.com/googles.html">Why There Aren&#8217;t More Googles</a>. The basic gist of it is that venture capitalists tend to be too conservative, investing in businesses that are based on already established revenue models. Nobody wants to bet on the new horse. But the most innovative start-ups are the ones that end up raking in a fortune!</p>
<p>But when most people think of the fairy-tale dream start-up story, they think of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Youtube">YouTube</a>. Founded in February of 2005, sold to Google in November of 2006 for $1.65 billion USD. Start your site, and twenty-one months later, you&#8217;re a millionaire. Wouldn&#8217;t that be nice?</p>
<p>The difference is, it takes an innovative, forward-thinking company to recognize and acquire an innovative start-up. Google itself was an overnight success story, pushed through to greatness mostly by the sheer stubbornness of its founders. Having run that gauntlet themselves, they know how to recognize a good idea headed by a tough entrepreneur. This is a skill that Old Guard companies like Microsoft fail to grasp &#8211; so much so that bloggers all over the web are asking whether <a href="http://www.askreamaor.com/microsoft-and-windows/reasons-why-microsoft-is-doomed/">Microsoft is doomed</a>, and has <a href="http://www.paulgraham.com/microsoft.html">prompted Paul Graham himself to pronounce Microsoft dead</a>.</p>
<p>Microsoft&#8230; dead. Imagine what a huge gap that would leave. Like the huge multinational banks in the United States which are getting bailed out during their economic turmoil, Microsoft seems almost too big to fail. If they did, there would not be another Microsoft. Their niche instead would rapidly be filled with the New Guard: smart, innovative, small companies that think fast and take risks&#8230; and know how to cooperate with the competition!</p>
<p>Peter Brittain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.northland.com.au/digital-strategy/why-arent-there-more-youtubes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Would Harlan Ellison Think Of Blogging?</title>
		<link>http://www.northland.com.au/digital-news/what-would-harlan-ellison-think-of-blogging/</link>
		<comments>http://www.northland.com.au/digital-news/what-would-harlan-ellison-think-of-blogging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Northland Digital</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harlan Ellison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northland.com.au/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did that headline get the attention of all you science fiction fans in the geek community? Go-o-od! Gotta get a hit somehow. Anyway, so The Ellison has this fun little rant on YouTube, where he whinges in true Ellison style &#8230; <a href="http://www.northland.com.au/digital-news/what-would-harlan-ellison-think-of-blogging/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did that headline get the attention of all you science fiction fans in the geek community? Go-o-od! Gotta get a hit somehow.</p>
<p>Anyway, so The Ellison has this fun little rant on YouTube, where he whinges in true Ellison style about how some agent called him expecting to do an interview for free on a DVD commentary. And he told them, as only Ellison can, to get stuffed. And <a href="http://www.8164.org/pay-the-designer/">a web designer posts this</a> in support of the view that web designers are not assertive enough with their pricing policies, too.<span id="more-91"></span></p>
<p>Fair enough. Except that the world market for web work <em>is</em> competitive. In any business, you have competition in the form of price, and no matter how much you complain about it, if somebody&#8217;s out-pricing you, you lose some business. The other point to compete on is quality. We can all do that, too.</p>
<p>We can also examine our overhead; I&#8217;ve known a lot of web designers who swore they couldn&#8217;t stay in business doing what others charge, and then it turns out that they have the pro version of DreamWeaver for development, the full Adobe CS3 suite for graphics, all running on Vista on a machine that&#8217;s ten times as powerful as they need, and running five monitors so they can look cool in their $750 Aeron chair while they design. Oh, and they need the top-dollar graphics card to play World of Warcraft on while they &#8220;wait for inspiration&#8221;.</p>
<p>Just a hint: It&#8217;s called &#8220;code&#8221;. A text editor can do it. But anyway&#8230;</p>
<p>You have to wonder about how far the writing profession has come since Ellison&#8217;s prime, and what he would have to say about the blog world were he to behold it. There&#8217;s millions of blogs out there just sending out reams of work every day for free. OK, granted, it&#8217;s ad-supported. And then there&#8217;s Wikipedia: what a mind-boggling amount of work is out there now, for no charge! But they collect donations.</p>
<p>The thing is, the web of the 21st century is becoming a new business model where if it isn&#8217;t free, it&#8217;s so close to being free that it&#8217;s hard to tell. Now, could you imagine explaining open source software to Uncle Harlan?</p>
<p>Peter Brittain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.northland.com.au/digital-news/what-would-harlan-ellison-think-of-blogging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

